Tuesday, March 17, 2009

BTN: Should Election 2009 Be Utilised To Define Secularism? Constitution Fails To Define.

Dear informed citizens:

If we categorize the election (India Votes 2009) in to two prime ideological categories - secular and non-secular - few interesting observations for you.
  • NDA has 1 PM candidate - Shri L.K.Advani
  • UPA-Congress - Dr. Manmohan Singh
  • UPA-LJP - Ramvilas Paswan
  • UPA- Sharad power
  • 3rd Front - (they are already (call themselves )3rd - said Dr. M.M.Joshi, BJP)
    • Mayawati
    • Naveen Patnaik
    • Deve Gowda (he says no.. but you don't know him - he may push his son). Both Father and son make a hell of a  'dramabaz' team.
    • Jayalalitha
    • Left party - Prakash Karat ?
    • Lalu
3rd front - the opportunistic front - the heavy weights will/might  cancel out each other. So chance of light weight Naveen Patnaik. A repeat of I.K.Gujral

Result: Appasement of minorities
           Appeasement of China
           Appeasement of Pakistan and Bangladesh
           Harassment  of US
           Harassment of Hindus
            Harassment of Israel
            No Citizen Identification card to facilitate illegal immigration from Bangladesh
            Corruption cases will be dropped against Lalu, Jayalalitha, Mayawati, Mulayam
             Why NDA and UPA will support full 5 years to such a 3rd rated government ? after 6 months or max 1 year - one more election.
             Taslimas will be kicked out and Afzal Gurus will be awarded 'Bharat ratna'

Eminent HT columnist and nationalist Professional Engineer. Suraj Singh further elaborates..
 
You want this to happen ?

http://hindtoday.com/Blogs/ViewBlogsV2.aspx?HTAdvtId=3526&HTAdvtPlaceCode=WORLD
Photo
P Eng Suraj Singh

By P Eng Suraj Singh-Should Election 2009 Be Utilised To Define Secularism? Constitution Fails To Define. What The Bharat India People Should Opt For Settlement As An Integrated Society? Shall Hindus Make Some Affirmative Demand? Why Should We Skip To Keep Secularism Undefined?

BlogPosted By: suraj on:3/17/2009 11:24:49 AM


It is a well known fact that the term secularism that has been made a part of preambles on the constitution along with other basic principles had been added on to the constitution in year 1976 during emergency era on the behest of Indira Nehru Khan Gandhi. It is also not clear what made it essential for Indira to include this term with the basic law when the nation had been smoothly moving without the addition of this term. All religions were respected as well as practiced freely without any degree of fear.

 

The people of Bharat India never had any frictional alignment with the exception of certain occasion during Bharat breaking into Bharat & Pakistan. Should we refer to the history of Bharat India, we shall find that it was Muslims & Christians from the other part of the world who conducted with cruelty with the basic native Hindus in Bharat India & this treatment continued for thousands of years by Muslims while for centuries by Christians.

 

The community of Hindus always suffered with full tolerance & complied with what the Vedas & Hindu holy books speak about. The Hindus always conducted as a peaceful community & never attacked the other nations. Yet, the Hindus have been considered as a devil community for the Christians as well as Muslims. There was no non Hindu in Bharat but all non Hindus are the converted lot who could not interpret the Vedas rightly & were misled by their own mighty religions. Their own religions do not recognize the honour of Hindus while Hindus may believe in Jesus & Mohammad secularly. The Muslims & Christians do not believe secularly.

 

Well, it is not aimed herein to talk of religions but the inclusion of secularism with the constitution is a topic of debate. All political parties owe to the people of Bharat who are being constitutional voters now for 15th Lok Sabha pertaining to the definition of understanding the term Secularism. Does Secularism include the freedom of being a Hindu or exclusively meant for the protection of Non Hindus from Hindus.

 

It is a fundamental & a natural right of every Hindu voter to demand an explanation particularly from all those political parties who proclaim themselves leaders of the secularism while appeasing the non Hindus in Bharat with full condemnation of the Hindu population. The Congress & the Left are the leaders of such proclamations while Lalu, Mulayam etc. are the narrow leaders who just intend to cook their food in the political Mess.

 

The future of the nation depends much on the recognition, honour & respect of Hindus & its religion on the same values as non Hindus are considered by the Congress & others. Hindus are the owner of this land. They should demand back their lost dignity from around the world. Pakistan was created in the name of Islam just opposed to the Bharat India. Now Pakistan has started deteriorating to political debris that may be sometimes converted to either a Taliban colony or US colony. The once beautiful part of Akhand Bharat has gone to others for none of the faults of Bharat Hindus.

 

Since, Hindus have remained sleeping for centuries submitting to just the cause of national development without caring for the Dharma, the time has come that the community must raise questions to the political would be guards for the real recognition of Hindus failing which the Islam as well as the Christianity would take over the nation in the coming future. Congress is hell bent to transform the religious map of the nation with condemning fully the Hindus. The definition of Secularism must deal with the Hindus at the top in all respects being the real owners of the nation. Hindus have been bashed so far but now this bashing must stop. There are millions of Bharat people who keeping the Hindu names have been converted to Christianity. This is not a healthy signal for a diverse society like Bharat.

 

It is a well known fact the talk of Hindus is considered on the communal lines while the talks of other communities is on secular grounds. This concept is leading the nation to religious hell with thanks due to the constitution. The constitution must be made clear & fair. The nation can never remain secular by the condemnation of Hindus & adopting the Western values to pollute & adulterate the Bharat culture. The 2009 voter for 15th Lok Sabha must keep in view the future of the real secular Bharat by forcing the politicians to respond to the definition of the top principle term within the constitution or else it shall be too late for the new generation as well as the nation. Terrorism menace cannot be combat without the real solution of the problematic term of secularism in Bharat India constitution. It is hoped that the voters shall make a move on the vote demanders so that these political servants know their job descriptions very well. Too sad it is that these rulers rule based on the Hindus votes while keep on bashing them continuously. We the people of Bharat must not submit to these politicians this time.

 

Jai Bharat Vandematram

 

P Eng Suraj Singh


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

1 comment:

Omkar Gurjar - SEO Blogger said...

Based on popularity, it can be predicted that Congress lead UPA will lead in the Lok Sabha polls. The prediction was not based on any scientific survey, but rather on ToI’s internal brainstorming session(s). They estimate that the UPA is likely to win 201 seats, the NDA 195, the Third Front 82 and Others 65.

If you think the Congress-UPA combine will win, vote "YES", if not, vote "NO".

http://www.myidea.co.in/voteonidea.php?i=169&smo=bcong

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Love 4 Bihar on Facebook