Saturday, January 31, 2009

BTN: Videha –27th issue e-published, visit http://www.videha.co.in/ feature late Ramrang's interview

Videha –Ist  Maithili e Journal 27th issue e-published, visit http://www.videha.co.in/

Enhanced sections-

Videha Archive now has:-

  1. All the 26 previous issues are available for pdf download in both Tirhuta and Devnagari Versions from the Videha archive link of the aforementioned link.
  2. Maithili Books download,
  3. Maithili Audio
  4. Maithili Video (Around 40 hour video)
  5. Mithila painting, modern art, photos of events/ street plays/ reportaz/ anthropological survey.

 

The Gadya-padya bharati section- Translation into Maithili from other languages (after taking permission and obtaining copyright)

Videha for non residents- Translation into English from Maithili (after taking permission and obtaining copyright)

Videha Maithili-samskrit tutor- through English medium.

Videha column for children

Videha column dedicated to music/arts

Mithila ratn/mithilak khoj

Mithila soochana/sampark/search

Maithili bhashapak rachna lekhan column- dedicated to enlarging database in panji/ manuscripts and English-maithili and Maithili English vocabulary.

 

Besides the prose and poem sections.

 The prose beside story, reportaz,research essays,travelogue,criticism,socio-economic essays now includes section for competitive exams.

The poem section have a mix of old and new poets.

 

The highlights of 27th issue-

Sh. Ramashraya jha "Ramrang" popularly known as Abhinav Bhatkhande died on ist January 2009. He was interviewed sometime back by Dr. Gangesh Gunjan, ist time in Videha we are presenting this invaluable interview.

 

Short stories by Subhashchandra Yadav and Kumar Manoj Kashyap.

The autobiography of B.P.Koirala, translated from Nepali by Brikhesh Chandra Lal

Novel Chameli Rani by Kedarnath Chaudhary.

Premshankar singh's essay- literature of Maithili language.

Devshankar Naveen on Novels of Rajkamal Chaudhary.

Dr. Shambhu kr.Singh for competitive exams- the problem of poverty in modern Maithili drama.

Interview

Ashish Anchinhar on Roopkant Thakur- criticism.

 

The poem section have-

 

Radha by Dr. Gangesh Gunjan,

15 poems by Gajendra Thakur.

Satishchandra Jha,s 2 poems,

Panbharni- poem by Jyoti

Vinit Utpal

Sattanjib by Dr.Pankaj Parashar

Mithilak Lel ek Olympic medal by BK Karn

 

Mithila Music/art by Hridaynarayan Jha on his series of lost mailili folk songs- 2nd part

Children section by Jyoti

 

Videha- The idea factory

We translate ideas into reality.

 But this is Just the beginning.

Videha has been read 1,46,161 times (from 1 January 2008 to 30 January 2009) from 711 places of 73 countries (Google Analytics Data)- Thank You readers.



--
Visit Videha Ist Maithili Fortnightly e Journal at http://www.videha.co.in/

Visit most popular Maithili Blog http://maithilaurmithila.blogspot.com/

GAJENDRA THAKUR


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

BTN: BAN MADARSA NOT CO-EDUCATION!!!

See where we are going with pseudo-secularism.
 
UP madarsa board bans co-education in its institutes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

BTN: fodder scam-truth or fodder scam-propaganda ?

http://www.fodderscamtruth.com/

All:

At very high level, It appeared to me like that 9/11 alternate theory (Bush/CIA caused 9/11 to attack Iraq/Afghanistan)
You may read it and classify accordingly..



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

BTN: Brotherhood pain::CAIR Seeks Reports of Americans Killed, Injured in Gaza

All:
 
The subject talks about 'Americans' but they apparently were trying to tell "CAIR Seeks Reports of Americans Killed, Injured in Gaza".
 
I am keenly observing President Obamas policy on terror. He knows that the brotherhood sympathy for extremists exist with every Muslim. But because of his father's Muslim background, the Arab/Muslim expects him to do things differently than his predecessor Pres. Bush.

 
His Pakistan/Taliban/Al quida/Israel policy would remain the same.
The decision of continuing strikes in tribal areas has been conveyed to the Pakistani government, says Robert Gates.
 
He may persuade Israel to vacate its Jews Settlements in Gaza/West Bank for a long term peace but may not be free/easy, as Israel is powerful enough to take on Arabs. Apparently Jews are equally influential in UK also.
 
After about 6 months or more when the civilian causality in FATA/AlQuida populated areas will be more and Pakistan will be crying for sovereignty, the brotherhood sympathy/pain will override Obama affection and President Obama will be treated by Arabs/Muslim world as another Bush..
 
Here you go..
 
Thanks
Manoj

 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: CAIR <info@cair.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Subject: CAIR Seeks Reports of Americans Killed, Injured in Gaza
To: manojpadhi@gmail.com


January 27, 2009
Action Alert
Forward to a Friend Support CAIR Contact Us Update Your Profile

CAIR Action Alert #567

CAIR Seeks Reports of Americans Killed, Injured in Gaza

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 1/27/2009) The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) today announced that it is gathering eyewitness reports to determine how many U.S. citizens, permanent residents or relatives of American citizens or residents were killed and injured in recent Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip.

American evacuees from Gaza and their family members and relatives in the United States are being asked to fill out an online form detailing their experiences during the Israeli bombing campaign on Gaza's civilian infrastructure.


U.S. citizens and their family members are currently being evacuated from the Gaza Strip. The number of American citizens to be evacuated has not been announced. It is not known if any Americans are among the more than 1300 dead, including hundreds of women and children, or the more than 5000 injured by Israeli attacks.

A number of Palestinian-Americans have reported the death or injury of relatives in Gaza. One Palestinian living in the Untied States described how Israeli troops prevented ambulances from reaching his dying brothers.

SEE: US College Grad Loses 2 Brothers in Israeli Shooting

In its attacks on Gaza, the Israeli military targeted individual civilians, homes, hospitals, mosques, a church, medical personnel, United Nations compounds, schools, universities, and an international media center. A number of civilians waving white flags were shot by Israeli soldiers. Israel's chief military rabbi urged soldiers "to show no mercy" in Gaza.

SEE: Rabbi Told Israeli Troops 'To Show No Mercy' in Gaza (AFP)
SEE ALSO: A Family's Deadly Ordeal (Washington Post)

"We need to know whether any Americans or permanent residents were harmed by Israeli attacks using American taxpayer-funded tanks, bombs, missiles and planes," said CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad.

Awad noted that many legal experts say Israel is in violation of international law and the U.S. Arms Export Control Act for using American weapons to target Gaza's civilians and civilian infrastructure.

IMMEDIATE ACTIONS REQUESTED:


1. ANYONE WITH INFORMATION ABOUT
U.S. citizens or permanent residents killed or injured in Israeli attacks should fill out the CAIR questionnaire at: http://questionaire.cair.com/

2. IMAMS, ACTIVISTS AND COMMUNITY LEADERS should urge that those who have relatives in Gaza or know American evacuees fill out the form and return it to CAIR.

- PLEASE ANNOUNCE, POST AND DISTRIBUTE -

Council on American-Islamic Relations
453 New Jersey Ave, S.E., Washington, D.C., 20003
Council on American-Islamic Relations Copyright © 2007 All rights reserved.



--


Manoj Padhi

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

BTN: Terrorists are not humans; they have no human rights: SC:: Why Guantanamo hell is right place for them

Kind Attn: All Human rights Activists/CIVIL right Advocates/Minority Brotherhood who think terrorist as freedom fighters.

More details: How they should be treated
http://hindtoday.com/Blogs/ViewBlogsV2.aspx?HTAdvtId=1657&HTAdvtPlaceCode=IND



Terrorists are not humans; they have no human rights: SC
Press Trust of India
Tuesday, January 27, 2009, (New Delhi)
A senior judge of the Supreme Court has likened terrorists killing innocent people to "animals" and said they cannot be allowed to take benefit of human rights.

"Those who violate the rights of society and have no respect for human rights cannot be a human," Justice Arijit Pasayat said at a seminar on terrorism in New Delhi.

"We should not talk about human rights violation of terrorists because terrorists are the people who kill innocent people with AK-47 and AK-56," he said, adding, "Those who killed innocent people by no stretch of imagination are human beings. They are worth not more than animals."

Pasayat stressed the need for effective implementation of the new terror law and said, "Investigators and prosecutors should be trained properly in this regard".

He also said that cases relating to terror attacks should be taken on priority basis as "it is the object of the Act".

Solicitor General G E Vahanvati while referring to the November 26 terror attacks in Mumbai said as a lawyer it would have been difficult for him to defend lone surviving terrorist Amir Ajmal Qasab.

"If I would have been asked to defend Qasab, probably I would have refused," Vahanvati, who hails from Mumbai, said.

The Solicitor General said he could not defend a person against his conviction.

"If I go and defend a person against my conviction it would be unfair," he said.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

BTN: Why our PM was stressed .. an Analysis

PM was under stress after 26/11: Pranab :: PM's stress analyzed : Click YES if you agree

--


Manoj Padhi

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Monday, January 26, 2009

BTN: Letter to Srilankan PM: Please ignore Mr. Pranb Mukharjee's big brother pressure. Hunt LTTE down.

To: Hon. Ratnasiri Wickramanayake
     Democratic Socialist Republic of SriLanka
    No: 58, Sir Ernest De Silva Mawatha, Colombo 07

Honorable Prime Minister:

I am an Indian and India is a victim of terrorism. No one can better understand the terror-concerns of people of Srilanka  than the Citizens of India.
It is imperative that LTTE must be neutralized and disarmed. A decade ago, our former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi tried to disarm by sending IPKF and because of that LTTE conspired to assassinate Shri Rajiv Gandhi; they did it and along with 50 other body guards also got killed. The family of the slaim policemen must be demanding LTTE chief's head.

They (LTTE) did it in a unique way (Human bomb) and became teachers of Islamic terrorists and inspired them to follow suit. After that event suicide attack has become a fashion. If in Srilanka,  they are causing trouble for the country, their Islamic terrorist disciples are causing global problem.

The NATO/USA are suffering because of an un-governable area like FATA/Tribal areas of Pakistan. Please don't repeat the mistake of keeping any ungovernable area  with in Srilanka under control of LTTE. Shri Pranab Mukharjee has no moral right to request you  for a ceasefire with LTTE, when he  keeping the war option open for Pakistan. He is under pressure from an cunning politician Mr. Karunanidhi, who is famous to play such  election tricks just before the election. Last election he distributed color TV to voters. This election he will be fighting with pro-LTTE + Free medical insurance for poor. He remembers poor only before 3 months.

But, this is about India's internal politics. When Srilankan Government has almost crushed the LTTE rebels and liberated the civilians under the LTTE control, there is no need for any ceasefire at this stage. Mr. Mukharjee's opinion doesn't represent the sentiments of terror affected India. Because of his party's soft on terror policy the parliament attack master mind 'Afzal Guru' is not yet hanged. Just ask him about - "How is Afzal Guru ?" and why he is treated as son-in-law in spite of  conspiring to kill all politicians in Parliament. ?

Dallas Morning News,a  premier news paper in United States, daily reports the achievements of Srilankan Army. I believe Americans and President Obama will support you.

Mr. Mukharjee  will tell you stories about "How Sonia Gandhi converted the death sentence of a convict, who killed her husband to life term and her daughter is trying to release her out after 14 years ?". They forget that the people of India lost a former prime minister and 50 women lost their husbands due to that LTTE. The people of India don't share her personal view of soft on terror and clemency to traitors.. Some persons don't get it from history. The people of India do.

By this open letter, I  request you to ignore Shri Pranab Mukharjee and his big brother pressure else your countryman will never forgive you. You have taken an oath to protect your country and I believe that like me, several savvy citizens of India, including from Tamilndadu will support your move to finish or disarm LTTE. Minorities may have some apprehension for their right to equality and safety and as a Democratic Socialist Republic , please promise them that they will be equally treated and will not be any 2nd class citizens. But, not another FATA.



Thank you
Manoj Padhi
A citizen of India


Dear fellow citizens of India:

If you agree, please click the 'reply all' button and encourage the prime minister of Srilanka to fight terror.




 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pranab Mukherjee rushing to Sri Lanka
Press Trust of India
Tuesday, January 27, 2009, (New Delhi)
External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee will rush on Tuesday to Sri Lanka where the military claims to have captured the last LTTE bastion of Mullaittivu two days back.

During the two-day visit, Mukherjee will meet President Mahinda Rajapaksa and Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama and discuss the latest situation in the northern part of the island nation, sources said.

Mukherjee is expected to impress upon Rajapaksa government the need for finding a political solution to the ethnic problem to ensure lasting peace.

He is also expected to press for early implementation of the devolution package to ensure that the ethnic Tamils get rights and privileges at par with others.

India has been maintaining that military victory will not address the ethnic problem facing Sri Lanka and that the government there needed to look for a political settlement wherein all communities, including ethnic Tamils, can live with respect and dignity within united Sri Lanka.

Mukherjees's visit comes in the back drop of strong demands by Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi and some other parties from the state that the external affairs minister should visit Sri Lanka and prevail upon Rajapaksa government to go for ceasefire.

During the recent weeks, Sri Laknan army has made rapid progress in its campaign to capture areas under the LTTE control. The military claimed on Sunday to have captured the garrison town of Mullaittivu, the last urban stronghold of the LTTE asserting that the 25-year-long ethnic conflict was now '95 per cent over'.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

BTN: An Indo-Pak brotherhood effort .. Will it work ?

Dear readers:

Apparently, Indian Muslims don't want war with Pakistan. Me too. As long as Pakistan cooperates (it appears now).

Just 15 days before their PM told that the evidence given by India was mere 'information'; that also in Pak national Assembly.

Laton Ke Bhoot - baton se nehin mante.

I believe that the Indian brotherhood people , would have done some sweet talk with their Pakistani friends in stead of a 'right talk' or rather straight talk.


They should be told - "Tell your Government to come out of denial mode and do whatever it takes".


What do you think ?

-----

Dear All,

 

Please find the basic info on the Pakistani delegation that visited India last week. The delegation was hosted by SAHR ( South Asians for Human Rights) and SAFMA. The visit coordinated by SAHR and ANHAD along with other organisations. Any of you wanting more details to do write ups about the visit can contact:

 

"Vrinda Grover" <vrindagrover@gmail.com>,

"Kamla Bhasin" <kamla@sangatsouthasia.org>

"shabnam hashmi" <shabnamhashmi@gmail.com>
 
Sincerely
 
Shabnam Hashmi
23, Canning lane, New Delhi-110001
Tel- 23070740/ 23070722
-------------------------------------------------------------

 

AMAN KARWAN FROM PAKISTAN

 

A 20 member Peace Mission (Aman Karwan) from Pakistan visited India from January 21-24, 2009.

 

List of Delegates

 

Mr. Haji Muhammad Adeel (Senator Awami National Party)

Ms. Farzana Adeel (Wife)

Mr. Ali Haroon Shah (former member Provincial Assembly & member of working committee PML N)

Ms. Asma Jahangir (Chairperson HRCP)

Mr. Ibn Abdur Rehman (IA Rehman) Senior Journalist & Bureau member of South Asian for Human Rights (SAHR)

Ms. Salima Hashmi (Artist &Human Rights Activist)

Mr. Iqbal Haider (former Senator, Law Minister & Co-chair of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP)

Ms. Syeda Maimanat Mohsin (Jugnu Mohsin) (Publisher and editor Friday Times)

Mr. Muhammad Tehseen ( Executive Director South Asia Partnership)

Mr. Brig (r) Rao Abid (Peace activist)

Mr. Dr. Abdul Hameed Nayyar (educationist research fellow SDPI)

Ms. Samina Bano Rahman (Women's Action Forum)

Mr. Kamran Arif (HRCP & specialist on FATA and Northern Areas)

Ms. Mussarrat Hilali (Vice Chair NWFP, of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan)

Mr. Chaudhry Manzoor Ahmed (former member National Assembly & PPP working committee)

Mr. Imtiaz Alam (Executive Director SAFMA)  

Mr. Nusrat Javeed (Senior Journalist)

Mr. Mustansar Javed (Senior Journalist)

Mr. Munir Ahmed (Munoo Bhai) (Senior Columnist)

Dr. Hassan Askari Rizvi (Independent political and defense analyst)

 

For Media Coverage

 

Ms. Phyza Jameel (Bureau Chief CNBC Pakistan-Lahore)

Ms. Asma Sherazi (TV Journalist and encore person)

 

The Programme Schedule in Delhi

 

January 22, 2008

9.30-10.15

Meeting with Comrade AB Bardhan, General Secretary, CPI ( pak delegation)

11.00-1.00

Round Table, Deputy Chairman Hall, Constitution Club with policymakers from India

1.30-2.30

Lunch- Interaction  with artists , intellectuals at the Consitution Club -

1.30-2.00

Asma Jahnagir – On Karan Thapar's programme-

3.00-5.30

Public Meeting , Speaker's Hall, Constitution Club, Rafi Marg, New Delhi

6.30-7.30pm

Meeting with Karan Singh, Chairperson, Foreign Affairs Department, Congress, Jayanti Natarajan and Mohsina Kidwai- Ashoka Hotel

 

8.00-9.00pm

Hum Log- NDTV-

9.30pm-10.00

AAj Tak/ Headlines today

8.30-10.00

Dinner hosted by SAFMA

South Asia Free Media Association at the Press Club of India

January 23, 2008

11.00-12.00

Meeting with Shiv Shankar Menon, Foreign Secretary

11.00-1.00

Meetings with Member's of the Media, members of Editor's Guild  at Magnolia, Habitat Centre, Lodi Road, New Delhi

10.00-12.00

 Parallel meeting at Tagore Hall, Jamia University

3.00-4.00

Press Conference at the Press Club of India organised by Press Club of India

5.30-6.30

Meeting with Mulayam Singh Yadav

6.00pm-7.00pm

Meeting with Prakash Karat , General Secretary CPI(M) ( delegation)

6.00-7.00pm

NDTV- We the people

8.00-9.00

Lok Sabha television

8.30pm

Dinner hosted by Ram Jethmalani

10pm

Meeting at JNU hosted by JNUSU

 

January 23, 2008

9.30-10.30

CNN_IBN

10.30-12.00

Meeting with IK Gujral, Former PM , India

 

 

 

 

STATEMENT ISSUED AT THE CONCLUSION OF THEIR PEACE MISSION TO NEW DELHI ON 23 JANUARY 2009

 

The 26/11 attack on Mumbai has  caused  deep shock to people in Mumbai, elsewhere in India and in fact in the entire South Asia region.  There has of course been an outpouring of sympathy for the victims and their families; but  the attacks have led to a serious questioning amongst many as to  the planning and execution of this act of terrorism, and to  interrogations of security and culpability. In addition, the  rapidly growing militancy in South Asia, particularly in Paksitan, is extremely worrying. Governments must co-operate in dealing with this dangerous menance and the Government of Pakistan has an obligation to play a key role.

 

SAHR, a network of human rights  networks in the region issued a press statement immediately demanding investigations into the Mumbai  incidents and its likely causes.   In the aftermath of the hostile comments from one side and evasion from the other, SAHR Pakistan took an initiative for a Peace Mission from Pakistan to India to engage in dialogues with different groups of political leaders, professionals, civil society leaders, to share  concerns of  the  emerging threats to democracy and peace in India and Pakistan and to create a climate for shared solutions.

 

The SAHR initiative received immediate support from many organizations and individuals in Pakistan, particularly SAFMA.  In India, over 20 groups of activists who had been organizing meetings and rallies for peace de-escalating the tensions, welcomed the initiative.  Indian peace activists welcomed the group in Amritsar and Delhi and organized a full programme to maximize the effectiveness of this initiative..  We are in particular, grateful to ANHAD and  SANGAT who joined SAHR in organizing the Peace Mission.  The Peace Mission does not represent any government or political party, This has been  a total people's initiative.

 

On 21 January, 24 human rights defenders, including lawyers, political leaders, artists, writers, members of Parliament from different parts of Pakistan crossed the Wagah border on foot and flew into Delhi, where we were joined by our counterparts.  To express their solidarity two SAHR members flew in from Bangladesh and Nepal. Between 22 and 23 January,  the "South Asian Peaceniks"  met with a large number of people.  Before leaving Pakistan, we  had met with the Pakistan Foreign Minister, and with leading political leaders from different political parties. In India, we had cordial meetings with Dr Karan  Singh, Chairperson,  Foreign Affairs Department of the Indian National Congress Party, AB Bardhan, the Secretary General of the Communist Party of India,  Mulayan Singh Yadav, President, Samajwadi Party and Mr Shiv Shankar Menon,  the Foreign Secretary,.  Views were exchanged at a Round Table with  leading policy analysts, academics, former members of the civil service, journalists to analyse possible plans of action which could be taken to defuse the situation, to start peace talks again and to press for action against the perpetrators.  At a public meeting,  as well as  at meetings with artists, writers and  cultural activists,  several speakers from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh affirmed the need for collective understanding.  

 

The attack on Mumbai is not an isolated incident,  similar incidents, not as well reported, have occurred elsewhere including several in Pakistan. In the Northwest of  Pakistan,  people are subjected to daily attacks by the Talebans, girls schools are being  forcibly closed down.  In Bangladesh too  there have been grenade and bomb explosions. The threat of such attacks is to our entire region and not only to one country.  Therefore it is important to share information, to build  trust in each other and to act collectively. Most importantly, the Government of Pakistan and all major political parties in Pakistan whole heartedly condemned the Mumbai carnage and remain concerned at repercussions it has had on the relationship between India and Pakistan.

 

We have sensed continuing doubts in India about action from Pakistan Government and responses of the people of Pakistan.  We share the anguish and trauma faced by the Indian people.  We extend our sympathy and offer our  cooperation.  In fact, in many parts of Pakistan, even in small towns there have been expressions of concern to protest the grenade attacks which have taken so many lives. In Bangladesh and Nepal there have been expressions of solidarity with the people of Mumbai and India.

 

During our meetings with different groups of people we have come across many diverse voices.  Some have been negative and untrusting, some have talked of "surgical strikes", but the overwhelming voices we have heard have expressed a strong need for peace and understanding, despite the deep sorrow and anguish they continue to have regarding the Mumbai attacks.

 

The " Peace Mission"  welcomes these voices because we are convinced that there cannot be a military answer,  it would not only destroy Pakistan's newly emerging democratic process, it would  also set back all our societies economically and make us vulnerable to global power politics.  Moreover, it would not affect the machinery of terrorists.  On the contrary it would give victory to the authors of Mumbai. We call for a greater sharing of information and understanding amongst ourselves and call upon our governments to facilitate the process of cooperation.  We call for a renewal of the peace process.

 

Despite the war mongering from different quarters within India and Pakistan we recognize and appreciate the restrained expressions from the Government of India. During our briefing with the Foreign Minister of Pakistan he too assured us that the  Government of Pakistan will be thoughtful of its public statements.  This is an encouraging sign but we realize that results alone will bring sustainable peace.

 

We thank the media which has given our mission of peace much space.  We have been able to reach a wider public. At the same time we regret that  the Press Trust of India circulated a report to different papers, covering a meeting where no journalist was present as it was a private exchange of views. We would urge the media to play a constructive and responsible role in promoting peace in the region.

 

SAHR will continue the process of deeper engagement between the people of South Asia so that decision making in the region comes from within. We are encouraged that a similar mission will be visiting Pakistan.

 

Finally, SAHR will continue to call for all acts of terrorism including the one in Mumbai to be thoroughly investigated and perpetrators of such acts be brought to justice in a free, fair and transparent manner. We believe that in order to sustain peace governments will also have to invest much more towards peace make the process transparent so that the people of South Asia can enjoy its benefits and dividends.

 

 

New Delhi

23 January, 2009

 

 

SAHR-SAFMA Peace Mission to New Delhi

Let People Unite Against Terrorism and War

Lahore-New Delhi: 21-24 January, 2009

 

            The South Asians for Human Rights (SAHR) and South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA) have jointly decided to take a Peace Mission from Pakistan to New Delhi from 21st to 24th January 2009. The 22-Member Delegation will interact with civil society, media and political leadership of India to stress the need to keep the peace process going, jointly fight the scourge of terrorism at all levels and in every manner and avoid war in the best interest of the peoples of India and Pakistan. The Peace Mission will explore the possibilities of reciprocation by the civil society of India.

The Peace Mission condemns, unequivocally and unreservedly the November 26 terrorist attack in Mumbai as a most heinous crime against innocent people. We share the grief of the families of victims and the people of India whose friendship we cherish.  Unfortunately, this outrage has brought India and Pakistan to a dangerous crossroads and we hope we will not be diverted from the path of peace. The two countries must not allow the terrorists to hijack the peace agenda. They must resume the Composite Dialogue process, and the sooner the better. War or even a state of suspended hostility between India and Pakistan will blight the whole region's future.

            India's rage after Mumbai was justified and the world had sympathy for it. When Pakistan revealed its hurt it didn't wash with the world and ended with bringing Pakistan's democratic experiment under tremendous strain. Unfortunately the media on both sides did not pay due heed to the long-term interests of the subcontinent's teeming millions.

            After passing through a denial mould, Pakistan has acknowledged that the surviving Mumbai raider came from Pakistan which it should have accepted much earlier. Subsequently, the interior ministry has ordered an investigation and vowed to bring the culprits to justice. We hope the investigation will be thorough and fair and the Pakistan establishment will take all possible measures not to let anyone use its soil for murderous games. Meanwhile, India must eschew anger and get Pakistan to engage in negotiations on the basis of verified facts of the Mumbai attack. Whoever planned the Mumbai carnage wanted to foment  conflict between India and Pakistan and prevent the latter from securing peace in its north western regions. They did succeed partially, but they must not be allowed any further success.

            We appreciate the role of the international community in helping to defuse the situation and  yet the South Asian context remains relevant. It is important that both India and Pakistan accept a South Asian cooperative methodology of resolving inter-state disputes. The wisdom may not appear realistic at the moment but it is unassailable. We must insist on evolving a SAARC mechanism for looking after our common problems.

Mumbai should not threaten Indo-Pak relations, nor should it endanger South Asia. It should compel South Asia to seek solutions to problems that are bound to become more trans-border than they are now. Terrorism is spreading like a disease. It has engulfed Afghanistan, a SAARC member, and has spread to most of Pakistan too. Some traces of it are already visible in India where a majority of the South Asian population lives. Instead of accusing each other of terrorism, the SAARC states must get together and discuss it as a common problem. A regional consensus against terrorism and extremism and a common strategy to fight it – that is the only answer.

            It is only in this context that SAARC states could ask one another for the surrender of terrorists guilty of cross-border outrages. There are two possible reactions to trouble as it looms on the horizon. One is to build high walls and block communication so that calamity stays on the other side of the border. This has not worked and may work even less in the days to come. The only casualties are the peace process and the truth. The other way is to open up the region to trade routes and transport networks allowing free movement of people, goods and information. The SAARC protocols on terrorism need to be made more effective.

The Mumbai attack was paradigmatic, which means patterns of behaviour must change fundamentally now for the sake of survival of SAARC states. This change cannot come through war. It must come through cooperation at both bilateral and regional levels. India and Pakistan must strengthen Joint Anti-terrorism mechanism. On the other hand, SAARC must evolve regional mechanisms and institutions to collectively fight terrorism, cross-border crimes, smuggling, narcotics trade and evolve a judicial forum to prosecute the terrorists and criminals wanted by one state or the other. We must forge friendship and burry the hatchet for ever. We wish India well, so should you Pakistan. The people must unite against terrorism and war and persuade their governments to forge unity against the common enemy.

 

 

 

Imtiaz Alam                       


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

BTN: Control of Israelis Evil on Western Media

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7849554.stm

Windows Live™ Hotmail®…more than just e-mail. See how it works.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Sunday, January 25, 2009

BTN: Shiv Sena doesn't like Valentine's day:: Ram Sena is looking for 'Sita's in Bangalore Pubs - Fools of India


Shiv Sena doesn't like Valentine's day:: Ram Sena is looking for 'Sita's in Bangalore Pubs - Fools of India


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Friday, January 23, 2009

BTN: Look How famous is a hair style..

The Economictimes
Barack Obama

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

BTN: Isn't It Time For A War Crimes Tribunal?

Isn't It Time For A
War Crimes Tribunal?

By Robert Fisk

21 January, 2009
The Independent

It's a wrap, a doddle, an Israeli ceasefire just in time for Barack Obama to have a squeaky-clean inauguration with all the world looking at the streets of Washington rather than the rubble of Gaza. Condi and Ms Livni thought their new arms-monitoring agreement – reached without a single Arab being involved – would work. Ban Ki-moon welcomed the unilateral truce. The great and the good gathered for a Sharm el-Sheikh summit. Only Hamas itself was not consulted. Which led, of course, to a few wrinkles in the plan. First, before declaring its own ceasefire, Hamas fired off more rockets at Israel, proving that Israel's primary war aim – to stop the missiles – had failed. Then Cairo shrugged off the deal because no one was going to set up electronic surveillance equipment on Egyptian soil. And not one European leader travelling to the region suggested the survivors might be helped if Israel, the EU and the US ended the food and fuel siege of Gaza.

After killing hundreds of women and children, Israel was the good guy again, by declaring a unilateral ceasefire that Hamas was certain to break. But Obama will be smiling on Tuesday. Was not this the reason, after all, why Israel suddenly wanted a truce?

Egypt's objections may be theatre – the US spent £18m last year training Egyptian security men to stop arms smuggling into Gaza and since the US bails out Egypt's economy, ignores the corruption of its regime and goes on backing Hosni Mubarak, there's sure to be a "compromise" very soon.

And Hamas has had its claws cut. Israel's informers in Gaza handed over the locations of its homes and hideouts and the government of Gaza must be wondering if they can ever close down the spy rings. Hamas thought its militia was the Hizbollah – a serious error – and that the world would eventually come to its aid. The world (although not its pompous leaders) felt enormous pity for the Palestinians, but not for the cynical men of Hamas who staged a coup in Gaza in 2007 which killed 151 Palestinians. As usual, the European statesmen appeared hopelessly out of touch with what their own electorates thought.

And history was quite forgotten. The Hamas rockets were the result of the food and fuel siege; Israel broke Hamas's own truce on 4 and 17 November. Forgotten is the fact Hamas won the 2006 elections, although Israel has killed a clutch of the victors.

And there'll be little time for the peacemakers of Sharm el-Sheikh to reflect on the three UN schools targeted by the Israelis and the slaughter of the civilians inside. Poor old Ban Ki-moon. He tried to make his voice heard just before the ceasefire, saying Israel's troops had acted "outrageously" and should be "punished" for the third school killing. Some hope. At a Beirut press conference, he admitted he had failed to get a call through to Israel's Foreign Minister to complain.

It was pathetic. When I asked Mr Ban if he would consider a UN war crimes tribunal in Gaza, he said this would not be for him to "determine". But only a few journalists bothered to listen to him and his officials were quickly folding up the UN flag on the table. About time too. Bring back the League of Nations. All is forgiven.

What no one noticed yesterday – not the Arabs nor the Israelis nor the portentous men from Europe – was that the Sharm el-Sheikh meeting last night was opening on the 90th anniversary – to the day – of the opening of the 1919 Paris peace conference which created the modern Middle East. One of its main topics was "the borders of Palestine". There followed the Versailles Treaty. And we know what happened then. The rest really is history. Bring on the ghosts.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

BTN: India's Reckless Road To Washington Through Tel Aviv

India's Reckless Road To Washington Through Tel Aviv

By Vijay Prashad

26 December, 2008
Counterpunch

On Thursday, November 27, in the middle of the Mumbai terrorist attacks, Imran Babar, one of the terrorists, called India TV from Nariman House. He used a cellphone that belonged to Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg, the co-director of the Chabad-Lubavitch Center. The following day, Babar and his associates killed Rabbi Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka. The phone call he made was not long. Babar opened with a comment that made little sense to most people: "You call [Israel's] army staff to visit Kashmir. Who are they to come to J &K [Jammu and Kashmir]? This is a matter between us and Hindus, the Hindu government. Why does Israel come here?"

Little is known of Babar's babbles outside the confines of Hakirya, the "campus" of the Israeli high command, and of South Block, which houses the Indian External Affairs and Defense ministries. What he referred to are the growing military and security ties between India and Israel. As well, he might have referenced the now rather solid links between the Hindu Right and the Israeli Right, and how their view of the conflicts that run from Jerusalem to Srinagar mirror those of the jihadis like Babar. Imran Babar and his fellow terrorists come to their critique from the standard anti-Semitism, anti-Americanism that blinds many aggrieved jihadis. Rather than make a concrete assessment of their grievances, they take refuge in as mythical a world as sketched out by the Israeli Right-Hindu Right, where Jews, Hindus and America are arrayed against Muslims.

That the terrorists attacked the Chabad-Lubavitch Center has renewed the call to see the commonalities between the victims of terrorism, whether those in a Haifa restaurant or a Mumbai train, between 9/11 and 11/26. To do so flattens out a significant differences, and reduces the violence to their acts themselves rather than to the social context that leads people to acts of terror. Mumbai provokes the Right to seek recourse to the solutions of war and surveillance, methods that might create a moment's sense of security before the wily adversary finds a new technological means to strike back. There is no common technical solution: better sniper rifles or iris scanners, better intelligence databases or cattle prods. The weapons used to deal the fatal blow to the terrorists are also incubators of a new generation of terrorists. This is an elementary lesson, lost to those who seek the silver bullet.

Why Does Israel Come Here?

On September 10, 2008, Israel's top army official, General Avi Mizrahi landed in New Delhi. He met with India's leading army, navy and air force officials before leaving for a short visit to Jammu and Kashmir. Mizrahi, a long-standing officer in the Israeli Defense Force, lectured senior Indian army officers at the Akhnur Military Base, near the Indo-Pakistan border, on the theme of counterterrorism. Later, in Srinagar, Mizrahi and his Indian counterpart, Army Chief Deepak Kapoor agreed to joint counterterrorism activities, notably for Israeli commandoes to train Indian soldiers in urban combat.

The Mizrahi visit in 2008 is not extraordinary. He had been to India in February 2007. In June 2007, Major General Moshe Kaplinsky brought a team of IDF officers to Jammu and Kashmir, where they met senior Indian officials at the 16 Corps headquarters at Nagrota in the Jammu region near the India-Pakistan border. Kaplinsky's team discussed the problem of infiltration, how militants from the Pakistani side enter the India. The 720-kilometer barbed wire fence, an echo of Israel's wall, has not prevented the transit of militants. Kaplinsky came to push other, high-tech means, such as night-vision devices, to help interdict militants. En route to Israel, Kaplinsky's team went to the Mumbai-based Western Naval Command.

In January 2008, to continue these contacts, the IDF's chief, Brigadier General Pinchas Buchris came to India and met the top civilians and the top brass. They discussed the procedures to share intelligence on terrorist activity. A week after Buchris returned to Israel, India's Navy Chief Admiral Sureesh Mehta spent time in Jerusalem, meeting IDF heads Gabi Askhenazi and Buchris. Between 2007 and early 2008, all three Indian defense chiefs visited Israel.. The framework for these meetings is the 2002 agreement to form an Indo-Israeli Joint Working Group on Counter-Terrorism, a long-standing attempt to create an entente between the armies of India and Israel, and to consolidate the immense arms trade between the two countries (India is now Israel's largest arms buyer).

The impetus for the relations goes back to the 1990s, when the governing Congress Party began to dismantle the dirigiste Indian State and to withdraw from India's long-standing non-aligned policy. The Congress government believed that it was time to reassess its relations with the United States, and that the best way to get to Washington was through Tel Aviv. Stronger ties with Israel might soften the reticence in Washington toward India, and lead it to loosen its bonds with Pakistan and China. India banked on Israel to play the broker with Washington. (This is the argument of my book, Namaste Sharon: Hindutva and Sharonism Under U. S. Hegemony, New Delhi: LeftWord, 2003).

In January 1992, the Indian government recognized the state of Israel. The next month, Defense Minister Sharad Pawar called for Indo-Israeli cooperation on counter-terrorism. Israel's Director-General of Police Ya'acov Lapidot visited India for an international police convention, and returned to Israel with news that the Indian government wanted Israeli expertise on counter-terror operations. Government spokesperson Benjamin Netanyahu told India Abroad (29 February 1992) that Israel "developed expertise in dealing with terrorism at the field level and also internationally, at the political and legal level, and would be happy to share it with India." In the Congress years, the main arena of cooperation came in arms deals, as India's massive purchases provided stability to Israel's previously volatile arms industry.

When the Hindu Right came to power in the late 1990s, it hastened both the economic "liberalization" policy (with a Minister for Privatization in office) and it shifted its attentions to Washington, DC and Tel Aviv: an axis of the three powers against what it called Islamic terrorism was to be the new foundation of India's emergent foreign policy. The close relationship between Netanyahu (then Prime Minister) and L. K. Advani (the Home Minister of India, and a brigand of the Hard Right) smoothed the path to intensive collaboration. Advani admires Netanyahu's personal history as a member of the Sayeret Matcal (special forces) unit of the IDF; Advani himself has no such on-the-ground experience. In 1995, when in Israel, Advani happily received Netanyahu's new book, Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorism.

Advani has since made it his practice to quote from the book, particularly the view that a "free society must know what they are fighting," which is the "rising tide of Islamic terrorism." This was all honey in Advani's ear. He drew the central concepts of his counter-terrorism policy from his friends in the Israeli government: a wall at the border, threats of "hot pursuit" across it; demur against political negotiation, escalation of rhetoric; limits on civil liberties when it comes to suspects in terror cases. Netanyahu had purposely refused to distinguish between Iran and Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas, the PLO and the Muslim Brotherhood. Advani too began to collapse the distinction between Kashmiri separatist groups and post-Afghan war terror outfits based in Pakistan, between aggrieved Indian Muslims and Pakistani proxy forces. As well, Netanyahu and Advani crafted a stage on which to enact an endless battle between Democracy and Terrorism, where the role of Democracy is played by the United States, Israel and India and where the role of Terrorism is played by Islam. It is all simple and dangerous.

During his June 2000 visit to Israel, Advani underscored his adoption of Netanyahu's framework during a lecture at the Indian Embassy. "In recent years we have been facing a growing internal security problem," he said. "We are concerned with cross-border terrorism launched by proxies of Pakistan. We share with Israel a common perception of terrorism as a menace, even more so when coupled with religious fundamentalism. Our mutual determination to combat terrorism is the basis for discussions with Israel, whose reputation in dealing with such problems is quite successful." Advani invited a team of Israeli counter-terrorism experts to tour Jammu and Kashmir in September 2000. Led by Eli Katzir, an aide to Prime Minister Ehud Barak, the team conducted a feasibility study of India's military security needs and offered suggestions for Israeli assistance. Three years later, Israel and India signed a military-arms pact that included a specific training mission. Israeli forces would train four new Special Forces battalions of the Indian Army; other battalions would learn the practice of "irregular warfare" and work with the Northern Command in Kashmir.

When the Hindu Right lost the election in 2004 to a Congress-led alliance, the pace of contacts lessened. With both Advani and Netanyahu in the shadows, the alliance lost its main champions. The Congress government recognized how toxic this alliance would be, unnecessarily inflaming an already difficult relationship with Pakistan. This was also recognized within Israel. Efraim Inbar, director of Israel's Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, who is actively involved in the Indo-Israeli contacts, recognizes the political problem; "this kind of cooperation needs to be secret if it can be," he told Newsweek. The military and arms deals between India and Israel continued, even if it was now treated as a sideshow. India remains a major importer of Israeli arms. What lingers in the shadows is the Israeli work in Kashmir. Little is officially revealed of it, even as leaks here and there hint at the extent of the contacts.

Technocrats of Terrorism

Ami Pedazhur, a political scientist from the University of Austin-Texas, joins the chorus on the New York Times op-ed page with suggestions for the Indian government after Mumbai ("From Munich to Mumbai," December 20). Rather than see anything new in the Mumbai attacks, Pedazhur conjoins it with an unbroken history that stretches back at least to the 1972 Munich attacks. What links Munich to Mumbai is neither the identity of those who kill nor those who are killed, but the means by which the killing occurs. Analysts of terrorism, like Pedazhur, are technocrats of counter-terrorist actions. They study how terrorists operate, and so what best security and military force can constrain them. The public policy that stems from this sort of technocratic view of terrorism has one end, to restrain the terrorist with more security checkpoints, more hot pursuit.

Why does the Indian government take advice from a government whose own security services have a dismal record of preventing terror attacks and whose own armed forces have failed to create stability on its borders? Israel's weaponry works fine. But Israel's counter-terror expertise is questionable. Pedazhur takes pride in Israel's counterterrorism policy. What pride there can be in a regime that maintains its safety through a ruthless military strategy is questionable. The Israeli government, regardless of the party in charge, is conspicuous not only for its treatment of the Palestinians but also, significantly, for its failure to create a secure society for its own citizens. It is easy enough to make the Palestinians the author of the troubles, but this of course ignores the intransigence of Israel's political leadership to produce a settlement. Because it cannot make a political peace, the Israeli authorities have perfected various technological means to minimize the consequences of its failures. This is what it wishes to export to India. For India, the imports signal the surrender of its leadership to the current imbroglio. Gated countries wallow in fear and hatred.

The costs of the Tel Aviv-New Delhi-Washington axis are too much to bear, at least for India. India cannot afford to mimic Israel's failed neighborhood policy, nor can it follow the U. S. example that seeks to solve its problems by aerial bombardment. South Asia requires a regional solution to what is without doubt a regional problem, one with its roots in the Afghan jihad of the 1980s as much as the unresolved Kashmir question (with close to a million troops in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, the Indian government runs what is tantamount to an occupation – they provide the opposite of security for the residents of the state). When the Afghan civil wars came to a unjust quiet in the early 1990s, the various foreign fighters returned to their homelands, emboldened by their self-perception of their victorious struggle: they went to Chechnya, the Philippines, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and into the Kashmir struggle. Pakistan and India are equally victims of these veterans of the jihad, and both have a vested interest in their demobilization. But more than that, there is a danger that as the U. S. amps up its war in Afghanistan and treats Pakistan with contempt, the jihadis will take out their wrath with the same kind of ferocity as they demonstrated in Mumbai. Rather than risk a failed military strategy against the jihadis, it is time for a regional conference on human security, one that includes better cooperation between the states and a program for the lives of those who are driven to the compounds of hatred through their many, many grievances.

Vijay Prashad is the George and Martha Kellner Chair of South Asian History and Director of International Studies at Trinity College, Hartford, CT His new book is The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World, New York: The New Press, 2007. He can be reached at: vijay.prashad@ trincoll. edu


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 View/Post  profile at http://hindtoday.com/bihar/HTMemberList.aspx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to BIHARTODAY-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BIHARTODAY?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Love 4 Bihar on Facebook